Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Grieving Widow Helps Spearhead First-Of-Its-Kind State Law On Suicide Prevention
- Everything You Need To Know About Woodland Park Zoo's Precious Doo
- Seattle-Area Skygazers May See Glimpse Of 'Blood Moon' — If They're Persistent
- Join Dick Stein And Nancy Leson For A Food For Thought 'Happy Hour'
- TurboTax Offers Taxpayers Option Of Getting Refund In Amazon Gift Card
News & Music Contributors
Fri February 8, 2013
Washington pays for more than half of births; half of those pregnancies unintended.
SHELTON, Wash. - It’s one of the most vexing problems state lawmakers face: how to curb the rising cost of healthcare. In Washington’s, there’s one specific line item in the healthcare budget that’s startling, but few at the Capitol are talking about: taxpayers now foot the bill for more than half of all births in Washington. Correspondent Austin Jenkins went to find out what that number is so high.
At Mason General Hospital northwest of Olympia, a newborn baby protests as a nurse checks his temperature and his diaper. Jack arrived three weeks early after his mom – Carly Earles – endured a miserable pregnancy.
Carly Earles: “A lot of vomiting, a lot of hospital stays, a lot of IV fluids, nausea medicine.”
Through it all, Earles’ medical care was covered by Medicaid. That’s the joint state-federal health care program for the poor. It paid for more than half of the nearly 86-thousand births in Washington in 2011.
Carly Earles: “I’m sure there’s plenty of people that don’t think that the state should pay for it. But things happen and you don’t have insurance.”
Earles, who is 28, says what happened in her case was her IUD failed.
Carly Earles: “Surprise. He was our surprise.”
Earles also has a six year old daughter named Hailey. She works part time in a church daycare. Her husband just got fulltime work as mechanic after years of unsteady jobs. They have no insurance. So, government funded coverage was their only option. Earles is a typical Medicaid patient says Marcia Rohlik, an administrator at Mason General.
Marcia Rohlik: “Working poor is a lot of this. You know the uninsured working. I mean, yes, there is a sub population, but it’s not the classic welfare mom. Those are more the exception than the rule.”
State statistics bear that out. The majority of women whose pregnancies are covered by Medicaid earn too much money to qualify for welfare. Here’s one other stat that also runs counter to the welfare mom stereotype. Dr. Laurie Cawthon crunches the numbers for Washington’s Department of Social and Health Services. She says most Medicaid deliveries are for a first or second child.
Laurie Cawthon: “The women who remain, the ten to fifteen percent who are having their third or greater child is on the order of less than 4000.”
Most experts agree it makes good financial sense to provide prenatal care to pregnant moms who lack insurance. It saves money later on from complications. But this coverage doesn’t come cheap. In the last fiscal year Medicaid spent $700M to care for moms and infants. Again Dr. Cawthon.
Laurie Cawthon: “Whatever side of the fence you’re on. It’s a very large amount of money.”
Especially when you consider this: The Department of Health surveys these new moms and asks them if their pregnancy was planned or unplanned.
Laurie Cawthon: “Just over half of women on Medicaid say that when they conceived their child they either wanted to be pregnant later or never.”
In other words, more than half of Medicaid births are the result of unintended pregnancies. Washington House Budget chair Ross Hunter says there are long term financial and human costs associated with so many babies being born into low income families
Ross Hunter: “It’s just a huge relationship between poverty as a young kid and bad outcomes.”
Hunter, a Democrat, believes the state must provide services that help low income kids overcome the odds. But he also hopes the federal Affordable Care Act and its focus on primary care results in fewer unplanned pregnancies.
Ross Hunter: “What we’re hoping here is that by having a relationship with a doctor because you are there any way they can say here you can go get this, this and all of a sudden you have a set of options available to you that are much broader than just what’s available on the shelf in the drug store.”
Hunter and most Democrats support expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Washington legislative Republicans say they haven’t ruled that out, but want to proceed carefully. We reached out to several Republicans for this story, but all declined to be interviewed. Recently, Washington expanded its free contraception program – Take Charge – to include women and men who earn up to 250-percent of the poverty level. Back at Mason General Hospital
Carly Earles: “Hi Mister.”
Carly Earles picks up her baby Jack and holds him close. She makes no apologies about having another child – even if he was a surprise and even though she and her husband are uninsured and make so little they qualify for food stamps.
Carly Earles: “I know that I’m a good mom and I know that I take care of my kids. And I’ll take care of Jack just as well as I have Hailey and I don’t think that being on poverty line is making me less of a parent.”
Earles is grateful Medicaid was there when she needed it. Next time she needs medical care she hopes she’ll have private insurance. Her husband’s new mechanic position offers coverage after six months on the job.