Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- UW's MOOC On Public Speaking Proving To Be Massively Popular
- How To Make Your Own Crème Fraîche — And Why You Should
- Washington's 'Pot Czar' Says Legal Marijuana Could Be Too Cheap
- UW Professor Traces Growing Income Gap To The Collapse Of Organized Labor
- Seattle Artist Turning Centuries-Old Pieces Of Wood Into One-Of-A-Kind Sculptures
News & Music Contributors
Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement
Tue March 29, 2011
Legal questions confront proposed Seattle referendum on tunnel
Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes has filed a legal challenge to a citizen referendum on Seattle's proposed deep-bore waterfront tunnel.
Holmes has asked a judge to rule on whether the construction agreements between the city and the state that targeted by the referendum are “administrative actions” which can't be overturned by the vote.
Holmes says he wants a declaratory judgment to clarify the issue before spending time and money on an election that might be declared invalid. It’s not yet clear if filing the suit will stop the referendum from going forward until a ruling is issued.
In a statement, Holmes said he believes the agreements in question are, "...more likely adminstrative than legislative..."
Tunnel opponents have filed nearly 29,ooo signatures for a referendum that would overturn viaduct construction agreements approved by the city council. That’s well over the number required to place the measure on the ballot.
Mayor Mike McGinn has supported the referendum, sponsored by the group Protect Seattle Now.
The Seattle Times' Lynn Thompson reports the potential for a delay drew quick response from the state:
State Transportation Secretary Paula Hammond said Monday that delaying the project to wait for a vote on a referendum would cost $54 million through August plus $20 million per month for every additional month the agreements weren't in effect.